[22 Paradise Rd., Northampton, Mass.]
I am vexed by not catching an earlier boat than this, but I have had a very full week. First, your long letter, or journal, arrived on Monday and gave me much comfort – incidentally to know that you had changed into a cabin to yourself in a better class; and this morning your first letter. I shall not expect any letter of any length for some time again, as you must be very busy indeed. Your long letter was full of good matter, and the best substitute for your presence that I could ask for. ICharles Eliot Norton Lectures (afterwards The Use of Poetry and the Use of Criticism)seem intemperate on further reflection;d2 am running through it again now – yes, I agree that the reference to Norton was very ill-timed and placed – but I dislike, and would suppress if I could, all the lectures I wrote that year – there is a kind of intemperate feverish aggressiveness about them, out of relation to the subject matter, that spells an abnormal state.1 I hope that in some ways – I know, not in all – I have improved since that year – but I hope I have become somewhat more gentle. A certain amount of success, and a life of comparative serenity, is good for one. ITandy, GeoffreyTSE's stylistic influence discerned in;b9 had not realised that Tandy’s style reflected mine at all (that is a kind of thing it is always difficult to see for oneself) but I can see how it might be so. AsRead, Herbertclashes with TSE in Criterion;b7 for Read, I agree that was not thrashed out satisfactorily – for one thing, I did not want, as editor, to write a reply longer than his letter. ButGermanyunder Nazism;b4 my point is, that if that sort of action was calculated to ‘bring the Germans to their senses’ I should feel it my duty; but as it merely stiffens and incenses them, and makes them feel (rightly or wrongly) that they are being preached to by folk no better than themselves who don’t understand their difficulties anyway, I deplore it. That is not to suggest that people as individuals should conceal their opinions about German behaviour. But I feel also that English opinion is apt to be one-sided, and that the people who cry loudest about Germany are often those who have preferred to turn a blind eye to persecutions in Russia – and I do think the English have a very irritating way of offering moral instruction to other nations – and I am not sure about the goings on on the Afghan frontier.2 NowFamily Reunion, TheEH questions Harry's entrance;b9 about Harry’s entrance – I am struck by what you say, and will certainly raise the point, to see how it strikes other theatrical people, when I have the manuscript complete. What I had meant was that he had noticed from outside that the room was in full view, so that that would be his first thought on entering. But I don’t know that that will work – very likely the audience needs to get a good look at a leading character on his first appearance, before he goes into violent action. I'Development of Shakespeare's Verse, The'composition and revision;a3 have nearly finished the Shakespeare – only a couple of pages of summing up to do now, one morning’s work. I think I will have a few copies made, so as to send you one; because I do not intend to print it for a long time, and I think it is well worth careful revision in the light of criticism and further thought. Then I may use it again as lectures in Paris and Copenhagen if I go there next year. And thank you for your encouragement in this task. As for your own mind, my dear, do not worry or hurry! a little gentle exercise each day – I find that the maximum of real thinking I can do is at most three hours in a day; and the deepest subjects are those to spend least time on at once – because one can only hope to solve the problems in the course of living, and with the grace of God – so long as they are ‘never far’ from the mind.
ITandys, theTSE's Hampton weekends with;a1 had a pleasant weekend with the Tandys and their children – except that on Sunday afternoon he had a B.B.C. acquaintance and his wife over from Hampstead, and they stayed to supper, and were rather uninteresting people, and I felt that that part of the time was rather a waste. IMorley, Frank Vigor;g9 have had to dine with Morley and his parents, who were leaving for Baltimore – andReads, the;a2 with the Reads last night, which is always rather an effort – andBabbitt, Dora D.;a3 to-day I take Mrs. Irving Babbitt3 to lunch (she returns to Cambridge tomorrow) andSalazar, António de OliveiraF&F to publish book by;a1 then have an interview with my Portuguese politicians about the Salazar book,4 andde la Mares, theTSE's dread of visiting;a3 then be transported to the De la Mares’ which I rather dread.5 They have a rather grand manor house in Hertfordshire, I believe, and Mrs. de la Mare’s grandfather was the Earl of Buckinghamshire, andWoolfs, thecompared to the de la Mares;d3 itTandys, theversus the de la Mares;a9 all sounds rather pretentious, unlike the simplicity of Woolfs and Tandys. (I don’t mind staying with really grand people, now and again, but I am not so happy with the betwixt and between). But they are very nice in their way, and he is a colleague, so it is a kind of diplomatic courtesy on both sides.
My dear, I am not likely to get used to your being so far away from me – the only thing I can agreeably think at the moment is that I am three weeks nearer to seeing you again. But I want so often during the day to take your head on my shoulder and rest you – and myself.
IThorp, Margaret (née Farrand)Criterion review of her book;b5 think Margaret Thorp should be pleased with the review of the Kingsley book6 (you shall be on the free list again, I shall see to that) butDunn, E. C.;a1 alas for poor Miss Dunn,7 my reviewer (a very competent Shakespeare specialist) who had several Shakespeare books sent him, has discarded hers as not really worth the space.
IPerkinses, the;g3 have heard nothing from the Perkins’s lately, and should like to know their plans.
1.The Use of Poetry and the Use of Criticism: TSE’s Norton Lectures at Harvard.
2.Up to 60,000 troops of the British Indian Army were fighting local tribesmen in the so-called Waziristan Campaign during 1936–8.
3.Dora D. Babbitt (1877–1944), widow of Irving Babbitt (1865–1933).
4.AntónioSalazar, António de Oliveira de Oliveira Salazar (1889–1970), leader of the authoritarian government of Portugal. F&F was to publish books by and about him.
5.In 1937 Richard and Catherine de la Mare took up residence in a fine eighteenth-century brick mansion at Much Hadham in Hertfordshire (they were formerly resident in Gower Street, London).
6.Margaret Farrand Thorp, Charles Kingsley 1819–1875 (Princeton, 1937), reviewed by J. D. C. Pellow in Criterion 17 (Jan. 1938), 352–5.
7.E. C. DunnDunn, E. C., The Literature of Shakespeare’s England (1936).
1.DoraBabbitt, Dora D. D. Babbitt (1877–1944), wife of Irving Babbitt (1865–1933).
4.FrankMorley, Frank Vigor Vigor Morley (1899–1980), American publisher and author; a founding editor of F&F, 1929–39: see Biographical Register.
3.Herbert ReadRead, Herbert (1893–1968), English poet and literary critic: see Biographical Register.
4.AntónioSalazar, António de Oliveira de Oliveira Salazar (1889–1970), leader of the authoritarian government of Portugal. F&F was to publish books by and about him.
2.GeoffreyTandy, Geoffrey Tandy (1900–69), marine biologist; Assistant Keeper of Botany at the Natural History Museum, London, 1926–47; did broadcast readings for the BBC (including the first reading of TSE’s Practical Cats on Christmas Day 1937): see Biographical Register.
16.MargaretThorp, Margaret (née Farrand) Farrand (1891–1970), author and journalist – see Margaret Thorp in Biographical Register.