[No surviving envelope]
I had rather hoped for a letter from you here (Grenville Place) this Monday morning; and as you have said, that makes a good beginning to the week. But perhaps there is a letter at the office (though I prefer to get them here, where I can read them alone and undisturbed); and also since I have been following the movements of steamships more closely, I no longer expect so much of the mails as I did. Since the Aquitania last week, there has been no boat until the Europa next Wednesday worth writing for. And you, my dear, do you prefer to receive one long letter by a good boat, or two or three shorter ones. I like a little of both! I mean that there is a great thrill in seeing two envelopes in your writing or typing, arrive at the same time; but on the other hand things can get said in long letters which aren’t always said in a series of short ones. Now I am writing this on Monday morning, and I shall try to write another the last possible moment before the Europa sails – because I always feel a peculiar pleasure in the most recent news, and in getting a letter which reduces distance by being dated only seven days before I receive it. I suppose if you lived in New York it would make a day’s difference, usually.
WellGwynne, M. Brooke;a6 I had Miss Brooke Gwynne to tea finally, and thought her very nice, and more than grateful for anything one was willing to do – a very modest person. We talked about her work with her teacher-students, and I have arranged to visit her class on the 25th, and talk for about half an hour, after which they could ask questions. I explained to her that I have taught children to like poetry, and therefore know nothing about teaching teachers to teach children to like poetry. TheHighgate Schoolteaching poetry at;a2 ‘poetry’ at the junior school at Highgate was, if I remember, a cut and dried affair, simply cudgelling them to memorise Lays of ancient Rome and so on. I finally suggested that I might take one of my own poems, and try to talk about it as if I was explaining it to children, and let them criticise my way of doing it. Of'Usk';a3 course it isn’t all of my poems that are suitable for the purpose! she picked the Usk little poem which she had liked that evening, and I think wisely; but I lent her a proof copy of my poems to look over, to let me know if she saw anything more suitable than that.
IHayward, John;e6 have to dine at Faber’s tonight with Hayward, going out in a car with him. IFaber, Geoffreyand JDH;e4 think it should be pleasant; they seem to get on quite well. I admire very much the way in which John is able to manage when he does go out. He has to be lifted in and out of the car by the chauffeur, and slid into his chair; and slides most skilfully on to a dining room chair and back again, and onto a sofa after dinner, and shows people how to haul his chair up and down stairs, without letting anybody feel at all embarrassed or conscious. AndMirrlees, Hope;a9 tomorrow I have to go to a small dinner at Hope Mirrlees’. ThenCulpin, Johanna ('Aunt Johanna', née Staengel);b7 I must see Mrs. Culpin this week if I can; otherwise I shall be at home quietly. (The food is not so bad as you think – it is rather that a week of it on end would become so monotonous as to take away my appetite; but I don’t often get the opportunity of that). There is not much inducement to go away at this time of year. The country is cold, unless you are living in it the whole year round; I dislike sea-side boarding houses; one would have to go right to the South to get any comfort. AndGermanyremilitarises the Rhineland;b1 aTreaty of Versaillesand Hitler's remilitarisation of the Rhineland;a5 political situation like that of the moment tends to immobilise one. IHitler, Adolfoccupies the Rhineland;a2 must say that I sympathise with Hitler for marching his troops into the Rhineland.1 That one-sided prohibition is galling to national pride; a sore which I should like to see healed. TheGermanyits territorial ambitions under Hitler;b2 occupation of the Rhineland cheers up the Germans and of course the presence of troops is beneficial to local trade. But how much better if such difficulties had been settled magnanimously while the French still had the upper hand! Now, of course, there may be French national pride involved too; and the French may think, that if they accept this situation quietly, it will only embolden the Germans to greater aggression. EverythingLeague of Nationsresponsible for the Abyssinia Crisis;a4 that happens tends to confirm my belief that the League of Nations was a great disaster. IfFranceFrench politics;b4post-Versailles;a4 there could have been firm cooperation and reciprocal faith between Britain and France after the war – the two most natural allies in Europe – so that France could have been assured that any German aggression would be resented equally by Britain, it might have been possible to obtain better treatment for Germany, so that the present German government and frame of mind might never have arisen. AndAbyssinia Crisisand the League of Nations;a8 without the League we should not have been involved in such a humiliating mess in Abyssinia – Italy and Britain could have come to an understanding in Africa.
TheSecond World Warthe prospect of;a1 complication of economic and purely emotional motives is desperate. I was told that intelligent German statesmen have no illusions that the recovery of colonies would make any economic difference whatever – it’s entirely a matter of ‘prestige’. Actually, and paradoxically, Germany seems to be in a stronger position than any other country. TheItalyas a military power;a6 French would certainly prefer the British on their side to the Italians, in case of a choice, because no one has any faith in the stamina of Italy as a military nation. And the League was finally damned for me by the admission of Russia. Whether the new Russian army is so much better than the old one is a matter of speculation; and in case of war Russia would almost certainly have to cope with Japan on the East, as well as with Germany and Poland on the West. These are dreary matters to think about, and one has run from them to do one’s job, such as it is.
I am indeed very dependent upon you, my dear. You ought to know, though I dare say you do not fully, how dependent upon you I have been all my life – how very dependent since 1930 – and much more dependent more recently – and that even as things are, you have brought so much into my life that my whole attitude towards life is different from what it would have been without you; and I turn to you night and morning and often during the day. And now I have written this letter without a word of your affairs, but I long to hear of them, as they are always in my thoughts.
1.On 7 Mar. 1936, in outright contravention of the Treaty of Versailles of 1919, and of the Locarno Treaties of 1925 – which had ruled that the Rhineland was thenceforth to be a permanently demilitarised territory – Hitler’s German military started to march westwards so as to occupy the Rhineland. However, since British public opinion had long been persuaded that the Versailles Treaty was little short of vindictive and unfair to Germany, there were no protests.
11.GeoffreyFaber, Geoffrey Faber (1889–1961), publisher and poet: see Biographical Register.
4.M. BrookeGwynne, M. Brooke Gwynne, University of London Institute of Education – ‘a Training College for Graduate students’ – invited TSE on 19 Jan. to participate in their Weds.-morning seminar: ‘Emily Hale suggested that you might possibly consent to come to the Institute to talk to our students; otherwise I should have not felt justified in asking you … The teaching of poetry is the subject most hotly discussed & the subject we should like you to choose if possible.’
11.JohnHayward, John Davy Hayward (1905–65), editor and critic: see Biographical Register.
2.HopeMirrlees, Hope Mirrlees (1887–1978), British poet, novelist, translator and biographer, was to become a close friend of TSE: see Biographical Register.