[22 Paradise Rd., Northampton, Mass.]
I got your letter no. 20 of Jan. 7th last night (half in pencil – I wondered wither [sic] the laryngitis had driven you to bed in the middle of writing it) and it has been as I thought, that the plain mail things have reached you before the air mail. So I will send this by plain mail, and you will let me know how long it takes: but it must always be a gamble, as one does not know when the boats sail – unless, I suppose, one is sailing, which I wish I were doing. TheHale, Emilyphotographs of;w7taken in autumn;d5 photograph is not so bad – good enough to keep, but not good enough to put up on the mantelpiece: I presume, though you don’t give any hint, that it was taken some time in the autumn. I fear that you have to use your voice all the time in teaching, and am anxious therefore lest the laryngitis may be slow to leave you: I trust that the doctor has given you good instructions, which you are following, about sparing the voice and treating the throat. This appears to be a laryngitis winter: though I have not had it myself, nothing but a tenacious catarrh protracted by the very severe weather. TheFlat 3, 11 Emperor's Gatewater pipes freeze;b6 last day or two have been milder, and in consequence the water pipes, which had been frozen in Emperor’s Gate for four days, are flowing again. It was very inconvenient, especially having no water for the lavatories; but I think it provided a spice of excitement in Elizabeth’s rather dull life; and though she got tired running down with cans to a tap in the mews, I believe she enjoyed it.
You must not feel dissatisfied with your letters, but believe in the satisfaction they give me, and believe that I feel them to be much more satisfactory expressions than my own. Letterwritingcorrespondence;a7 writing is not an easy form for me: inpoetryand the dissimulation of feeling;b8 poetry I can dissimulate feeling and in personal contact I can (some of the time!) express it, but in letter writing I tend to be able to express myself only in gossip and banter. After I have got into bed, or travelling in the train, I think of remarks I should like to make; and when I sit down to my machine they have vanished. IEast CokerTSE on writing;a6 am toiling to get going on a poem, but it does not come at all easily now.1 ThisSecond World Warits effect on TSE;b3 partwritingthe effect of war on;c7 ofHale, Emilycorrespondence with TSE;w3constrained by war;g8 the war is merely a period of waiting, and trying to be patient; there is not even a great deal about it at present on which one can relieve oneself by thinking; one is oppressed by a sense of mediocrity and helplessness where there ought to be genius and enterprise, and it is a struggle to keep one’s own mind – and even feelings – acute. Correspondence seems all the more unsatisfactory means of communication, this winter, than before; I try to feel as if we were sitting in the sun in the back garden, side by side, with your face and your voice to help me.
IddingsBell, Bernard Iddingsin Church Times contretemps;a9 BellDark, Sidneyurged to moderate tone;a3 andChurch TimesIddings Bell contretemps in;b1 Sidney Dark (the editor of the ‘Church Times’) have been growling at each other over the war, and over Bell’s opinions as expressed in some American church paper, and I have been taking issue with both of them for the tone they adopt; a lack of charity on both sides, it seemed to me.2
Try to realise that your letters are the greatest support to me – and then, that I want mine to be the same to you. And in the depths, I know that there is always a living source of gladness which I owe to you.
1.East Coker.
2.‘LaicusBell, Bernard Iddingsin Church Times contretemps;a9 Ignotus’ (‘Unknown Layman’) wrote in ‘From a Journalist’s Note-Book’ (Church Times, 1 Dec. 1939) in scorn of Iddings Bell’s arguments against U.S. intervention in the war. ‘Dr Bell ridicules the claim that Great Britain is fighting for liberty, democracy and justice, and he has the effrontery to declare she is really fighting to save herself from becoming a secondary world power … Dr Goebbels should be grateful to him, and doubtless is.’
Iddings Bell responded with a letter to the Church Times, 18 Dec. 1939 (published on 12 Jan. 1940, 22): ‘Sir,– I have noticed what seems to me a grotesque misrepresentation of certain arguments of mine in favour of our neutrality in the present European war, a misrepresentation which has appeared in your Journalist’s Note-Book. Your writer calls me an “anti-British partisan”, and implies that I am a sort of agent of German propaganda […] Certainly I am not anti-British. The issues involved in this conflict do not, it is true, seem to me as simple as they do to some – though by no means to all – my British correspondents. In times like these, one who is neither pro-British not anti-British, but simply pro-American, may, I should think, be permitted to speak his mind in his own country. You seem to think that such freedom is to be allowed only at the cost of alienating for ever my many British friends. Frankly, I think you misrepresent your people. / Bernard Iddings Bell.’
There followed this note by the editor: ‘It has been an unpleasant duty to quote from Dr Bell’s writings on the war and on Britain’s aims. These quotations have, we should suppose, alienated for ever all his British admirers.’
See TSE’s letter (‘Hole and Corner Buffery’) to the Church Times, 14 Jan. 1940; TSE to Iddings Bell, 25 Jan. 1940; TSE to Iddings Bell, 7 Mar. 1940 (Letters 9, 388–9, 400–1, 441–2).
3.BernardBell, Bernard Iddings Iddings Bell, DD (1886–1958), American Episcopal priest, author and cultural commentator; Warden of Bard College, 1919–33. In his last years he was made Canon of the Cathedral of Saints Peter and Paul, Chicago, and a William Vaughn Lecturer at the University of Chicago.
1.SidneyDark, Sidney Dark (1872–1947), editor of the Anglo-Catholic Church Times, 1924–41.