[41 Brimmer St., Boston]
I have no letter this week – nothing to-day to remind me that there is an American mail except a letter from a young man in New York who has written a novel: nothing out of the ordinary in that. So I feel as always, a little forlorn, and I think must postpone one or two things I had in mind to discuss until Monday, when I hope for some reassurances. As for the Photograph Portrait, I shall believe in that when I see it!
I am also feeling rather tired to-day: my'Preface' (to Bubu de Montparnasse);a1 Preface to Bubu de Montparnasse,1 my'George Herbert';a1 note on George Herbert for Evelyn Underhill for the Spectator,2 andCriterion, TheApril 1932;c1laborious 'Commentary';a1 my Commentary, although all short, all came out of my head with great effort; and now I have got to settle down seriously to my four broadcast talks, as they begin on Sunday Week. I'Modern Dilemma, The'being composed;a3 have written one and part of another, but they need revising: and the subject, ‘The Modern Dilemma’, is so vague and vast that they must be very well done to be worth doing at all. AndCharles Eliot Norton Lectures (afterwards The Use of Poetry and the Use of Criticism)a task for Lent;a2 by April I must really get to work on Norton lectures.
WeThorps, thegrow on TSE;b4 had a very pleasant evening with the Thorps, who become more congenial all the time. AtThorp, Willardteaches Ombre to the Eliots;a7 the end of the evening Willard tried to teach us how to play ombre, which he had just learnt from some old book; (at this point a Hindu came in to borrow ten shillings, which I sent down to him): and it not only makes much more admirable the passage about the game in The Rape of the Lock,3 but is a very good card game indeed; and we are going to play again at Lincolns [sic] Inn next week. RobertGeorge, Robert Esmonde Gordon ('Robert Sencourt');b2 Sencourt is again with us for a few nights before returning to Hyères to stay with his mother, and as always, is very welcome. The weather is cold and bitter, and Holy Week comes near. And no more have I to send to-day, my dear, except my constant thoughts which I hope your guardian angel may use in watching over you.
1.See TSE’s Preface to Charles-Louis Philippe, Bubu de Montparnasse, trans. Laurence Vail (Paris, 1932): CProse 4, 417–21. ‘There have been many novels of low life, of metropolitan vice and degradation. Novels of sentimentality, novels of satire, novels of indignation, novels of social reform, novels of prurience. Bubu de Montparnase succeeds in being none of these: emphatically not the last. Philippe certainly disturbs any lingering complacency that we may feel towards the world as it is; but he has no cure to advocate. He is both compassionate and dispassionate; in his book we blame no one, we blame not even a “social system”; and even the most virtuous, in reading it, may feel: I have sinned exceedingly in thought, word and deed.’
2.‘George Herbert’, Spectator 148 (12 Mar. 1932), 360–1.
3.Alexander Pope, The Rape of the Lock, canto iii, 25–7:
Belinda now, whom Thirst of Fame invites,
Burns to encounter two adventurous Knights,
At Ombre singly to decide their doom …
3.RobertGeorge, Robert Esmonde Gordon ('Robert Sencourt') Esmonde Gordon George – Robert Sencourt (1890–1969) – critic, historian, biographer: see Biographical Register.
1.Margaret Thorp, née Farrand (1891–1970), contemporary and close friend of EH; noted author and biographer. WillardThorp, Willard Thorp (1899–1990) was a Professor of English at Princeton University. See Biographical Register. See further Lyndall Gordon, Hyacinth Girl, 126–8, 158–9.